NoHtmlMailsPlease
2011-10-07 20:47:02 UTC
One can learn from Anglo-America-Corp who don't donate to bleeding-heart
projects, but rather find projects that have PROVEN to work, and contribute
to those.
So too one can copy the marvels of the free enterprise native-taxi transport
industry, which provides efficient/cheap transport for tens of millions of
clients, without government price control.
Similarly the increasing looting of tax revenues by government officicials
can be reduced by allowing more open computation.
Government looters hate open competition, that's why they love arms deals,
which by their very nature need to be closed and secret.
The coming expansion of national electricity capacity, gives opportunities
for the NC looters which dwarf their arms deal looting.
When you have 50 taxi drivers or Timoteo vendors competing, you are safe
from being screwed. Market competition protects you.
Therefore it's absurd to benefit substantially from "getting tenders",
since tendering to erg. build a school, should under open and competitive
conditions, return no more or less return on capital than other enterprises.
In the long term, building schools or polishing diamonds or processing
garbage are equally remunerative, because resources will flow to the
more profitable activate, and thereby compete it's remuneration down.
This applies always provided entry and competitors is free.
The only reason why banking is currently so lucrative, is that the
SHORT TERM change in global economic actively, requires increased
banking capacity/skills.
Similarly in current S.A. law professionals are able to charge exorbitance
fees, because the recent social chaos greatly increases the demand for
their services, until more law professionals are created and people
realise that doing a "Bret Kebble" works better than the law.
So the ABILITY to "give tenders" to comrades, is a contradiction in
terms: tendering MEANS open and competitive.
projects, but rather find projects that have PROVEN to work, and contribute
to those.
So too one can copy the marvels of the free enterprise native-taxi transport
industry, which provides efficient/cheap transport for tens of millions of
clients, without government price control.
Similarly the increasing looting of tax revenues by government officicials
can be reduced by allowing more open computation.
Government looters hate open competition, that's why they love arms deals,
which by their very nature need to be closed and secret.
The coming expansion of national electricity capacity, gives opportunities
for the NC looters which dwarf their arms deal looting.
When you have 50 taxi drivers or Timoteo vendors competing, you are safe
from being screwed. Market competition protects you.
Therefore it's absurd to benefit substantially from "getting tenders",
since tendering to erg. build a school, should under open and competitive
conditions, return no more or less return on capital than other enterprises.
In the long term, building schools or polishing diamonds or processing
garbage are equally remunerative, because resources will flow to the
more profitable activate, and thereby compete it's remuneration down.
This applies always provided entry and competitors is free.
The only reason why banking is currently so lucrative, is that the
SHORT TERM change in global economic actively, requires increased
banking capacity/skills.
Similarly in current S.A. law professionals are able to charge exorbitance
fees, because the recent social chaos greatly increases the demand for
their services, until more law professionals are created and people
realise that doing a "Bret Kebble" works better than the law.
So the ABILITY to "give tenders" to comrades, is a contradiction in
terms: tendering MEANS open and competitive.